Algorithmic Accuracy as a Motivational Driver in Robot-Mediated Learning: A Comparative Study of Cross-Correlation and CNN-Based Sound Detection in an Interactive Quiz Game

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Robot Papers editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为 VLA、具身智能、人形机器人控制、机器人操作等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

In competitive learning activities, inaccurate robot decisions may reduce students' perceptions of fairness and competence, ultimately affecting their motivation. This paper investigates whether the accuracy of sound detection algorithms influences student motivation during a robot-mediated quiz game. A Pepper humanoid robot hosted an interactive buzzer-based quiz in which two sound detection approaches, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a Cross-Correlation algorithm, were evaluated using a controlled between-subjects experiment involving 40 university students. Participants were equally assigned to a CNN group (n = 20) and a Cross-Correlation group (n = 20). Both groups completed the same quiz under identical conditions, differing only in the sound detection algorithm used for first-responder identification. Student motivation was assessed using the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), while algorithm performance was evaluated through real-time detection accuracy. The results indicate that the Cross-Correlation approach achieved more reliable sound detection under classroom conditions and produced significantly higher scores across all IMI subscales, demonstrating greater student interest, perceived competence, effort, perceived choice, and lower perceived pressure (after reverse coding). These findings provide empirical support for the proposed Algorithmic Precision-Motivation Relationship (APMR) model, demonstrating that algorithmic accuracy is not merely an engineering performance metric but an important factor influencing learner motivation in robot-assisted educational environments.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments