Robotics paper index
Language-Guided Representation Learning for Robust Cross-Sensor Material Recognition
One-line summary
A robotics research paper on Language-Guided Representation Learning for Robust Cross-Sensor Material Recognition.
Engineering notes
Engineering notes will be added by the Robot Papers editorial team.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充:本站会优先为 VLA、具身智能、人形机器人控制、机器人操作等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
Robots need touch to manipulate objects safely and reliably, as many properties, such as softness, texture, and contact stability, are hard to infer from vision alone. However, vision-based tactile sensors yield different observations of the same material due to variations in optics, elastomer properties, and illumination, leading to poor generalization when trained on a single or multiple sensors. We propose a language-guided distillation framework for learning sensor-robust tactile representations. Language encodes high-level semantic properties of touch (e.g., rough, soft, slippery) that remain invariant across sensing hardware, providing a natural sensor-agnostic supervisory signal. We construct a 39K-sample touch-language dataset with human-annotated material labels and train a tactile encoder to align sensor-specific tactile images with language embeddings in a shared semantic space. We evaluate our approach for few-shot learning and cross-sensor transfer and benchmark it on six existing tactile datasets. Our method achieves 95% accuracy in the 100-shot setting, improves cross-sensor transfer by an average of 13.3% accuracy, and yields up to 19% accuracy gains across six existing tactile datasets. These results demonstrate that language-guided distillation enables scalable and hardware-agnostic tactile representation learning. Code and dataset are available at https://mashood3624.github.io/Language_Tactile/
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
Robot Papers can prepare a custom robotics literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.
Request B2B research
Comments