Robotics paper index
Max-Q Selective Imitation for Human-in-the-Loop Online Robot Learning
One-line summary
A robotics research paper on Max-Q Selective Imitation for Human-in-the-Loop Online Robot Learning.
Engineering notes
Engineering notes will be added by the Robot Papers editorial team.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充:本站会优先为 VLA、具身智能、人形机器人控制、机器人操作等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
Human-in-the-loop (HIL) online reinforcement learning for real robots must absorb human interventions quickly while continuing to improve beyond the human prior. We present a training method for this setting based on two components. First, an \emph{MC Q-chunk} critic regresses chunk-level action values onto Monte Carlo returns from the replay buffer, performing sample-average (behavior) policy evaluation so that intervention trajectories are credited directly rather than diluted by current-policy TD backups. Second, \emph{max-Q selective imitation} updates the actor by imitating, at each state, the higher-$Q$ action between the current policy action and a buffer sample under a hard winner-take-all rule. This rule automatically switches between learning from interventions and on-policy self-improvement: when the autonomous policy is stronger, targets align with the policy distribution, reducing the policy--target-sample gap that otherwise induces execution-time distribution shift. In practice we score candidates with a standard critic ensemble mean to reduce comparison noise, without softening targets or introducing score-gap thresholds. On a real USB pick-and-insertion task with 20 demonstrations, ACT QChunk-MCBC attains 99\% success within 30 minutes of HIL training, whereas HIL-SERL requires about 5 hours to converge. In simulation on Peg Insertion and Square, ACT/Flow Q-chunk variants similarly reach $\ge$96\% success within roughly half an hour of effective training, outperforming HIL-SERL, EXPO, and E2HiL on the success--time frontier.
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
Robot Papers can prepare a custom robotics literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.
Request B2B research
Comments